The identification of sympatric cryptic free-living nematode species in the Antarctic intertidal

PLoS One. 2017 Oct 5;12(10):e0186140. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186140. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

The diversity of free-living nematodes in the beaches of two Antarctic islands, King George and Deception islands was investigated. We used morphological and molecular (LSU, and two fragments of SSU sequences) approaches to evaluate 236 nematodes. Specimens were assigned to at least genera using morphology and were assessed for the presence of cryptic speciation. The following genera were identified: Halomonhystera, Litoditis, Enoploides, Chromadorita, Theristus, Oncholaimus, Viscosia, Gammanema, Bathylaimus, Choanolaimus, and Paracanthonchus; along with specimens from the families Anticomidae and Linhomoeidae. Cryptic speciation was identified within the genera Halomonhystera and Litoditis. All of the cryptic species identified live sympatrically. The two cryptic species of Halomonhystera exhibited no significant morphological differences. However, Litoditis species 2 was significantly larger than Litoditis species 1. The utility of molecular data in confirming the identifications of some of the morphologically more challenging families of nematodes was demonstrated. In terms of which molecular sequences to use for the identification of free-living nematodes, the SSU sequences were more variable than the LSU sequences, and thus provided more resolution in the identification of cryptic speciation. Finally, despite the considerable amount of time and effort required to put together genetic and morphological data, the resulting advance in our understanding of diversity and ecology of free-living marine nematodes, makes that effort worthwhile.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Antarctic Regions
  • Bayes Theorem
  • DNA, Helminth / isolation & purification
  • Nematoda / classification*
  • Nematoda / genetics
  • Phylogeny
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction

Substances

  • DNA, Helminth

Grants and funding

This project was funded by Instituto Antártico Chileno (INACH) Project T_13-10, to M.R.L, C.E.H. and A.B. C.E.H. and C.B.C.A. are grateful for funding from Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (FONDECYT) grants 1140692 and 3150456 respectiviely. The Instituto Antártico Chileno provided logistical support in Antarctica. Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.