Theory versus practice in the human factors and ergonomics discipline: Trends in journal publications from 1960 to 2010

Appl Ergon. 2018 Jan:66:41-51. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Aug 17.

Abstract

The research-practice gap has been highlighted as a barrier to effective practice in human factors and ergonomics (HFE). There is also evidence of a theory-research gap that may be limiting the scientific evidence base of HFE. The purpose of this study was to examine trends in journal publications, especially relating to the research-practice gap and the involvement of theory over time. A content analysis was conducted on 425 journal articles published in Human Factors, Ergonomics, and Applied Ergonomics from 1960 to 2010. Results showed evidence of growth in applied research with increasing collaborative research between research and industry, larger research teams, and more empirical research-especially on applied problems. While there has been a corresponding increase in the involvement of theory in HFE publications, around half of the publications failed to acknowledge theory. This calls into question whether the HFE discipline may be missing the benefits of theory to guide research and subsequent practice, and to enhance the development of new ideas.

Keywords: Practice; Research publications; Theory.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Empirical Research*
  • Ergonomics*
  • Humans
  • Industry*
  • Models, Theoretical*
  • Periodicals as Topic / trends*