Psychosocial aspect of quality of life among working and unemployed nurses and midwives

Ann Agric Environ Med. 2017 Sep 21;24(3):472-476. doi: 10.5604/12321966.1235172. Epub 2017 May 11.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to explain differences in the subjective evaluation of the psychological and social aspects of quality of life in a group of working and unemployed nurses and midwives.

Material and methods: The survey was conducted in a group of 620 professionally-active and inactive people (315 nurses and 305 midwives), selected by random stratified-systematic sampling. The tool used to gather empirical material was the standardized questionnaire WHOQoL-100.

Results: Professionally-active nurses evaluated the mental domain less favourably (M=12.33), compared with unemployed nurses (M=12.73), and the difference between average values was statistically significant (p=.043). It is also worth noting that in the group of midwives there were significant differences in each discussed domain. The unemployed respondents evaluated more positively the overall quality of life (M=14.29; p=.005) and the mental domain (M=12.85; p=.009), while the social domain was evaluated less favourably by the professionally-active midwives (M=12.73; p=.022).

Conclusions: Paradoxically, those who were unemployed made slightly more positive evaluations in comparison with the professionally active. Professional work is not a factor preferably affecting the quality of life and its psychosocial dimension. The higher quality of life of the unemployed respondents may result from the buffering impact of social support.

Keywords: midwife; nurses; quality of life; unemployment.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Employment / psychology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Midwifery* / economics
  • Nurses / economics
  • Nurses / psychology*
  • Quality of Life
  • Unemployment
  • Workforce
  • Young Adult