Discussing Benefits and Risks of Tracheostomy: What Physicians Actually Say

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Dec;18(12):e592-e597. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001341.

Abstract

Objectives: When contemplating tracheostomy placement in a pediatric patient, a family-physician conference is often the setting for the disclosure of risks and benefits of the procedure. Our objective was to compare benefits and risks of tracheostomy presented during family-physician conferences to an expert panel's recommendations for what should be presented.

Design: We conducted a retrospective review of 19 transcripts of audio-recorded family-physician conferences regarding tracheostomy placement in children. A multicenter, multidisciplinary expert panel of clinicians was surveyed to generate a list of recommended benefits and risks for comparison. Primary analysis of statements by clinicians was qualitative.

Setting: Single-center PICU of a tertiary medical center.

Subjects: Family members who participated in family-physician conferences regarding tracheostomy placement for a critically ill child from April 2012 to August 2014.

Measurements and main results: We identified 300 physician statements describing benefits and risks of tracheostomy. Physicians were more likely to discuss benefits than risks (72% vs 28%). Three broad categories of benefits were identified: 1) tracheostomy would limit the impact of being in the PICU (46%); 2) perceived obstacles of tracheostomy can be overcome (34%); and 3) tracheostomy optimizes respiratory health (20%). Risks fell into two categories: tracheostomy involves a big commitment (71%), and it has complications (29%). The expert panel's recommendations were similar to risks and benefits discussed during family conferences; however, they suggested physicians present an equal balance of discussion of risks and benefits.

Conclusions: When discussing tracheostomy placement, physicians emphasized benefits that are shared by physicians and families while minimizing the risks. The expert panel recommended a balanced approach by equally weighing risks and benefits. To facilitate educated decision making, physicians should present a more extensive range of risks and benefits to families making this critical decision.

MeSH terms

  • Critical Illness
  • Decision Making*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Intensive Care Units, Pediatric
  • Male
  • Parental Consent*
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'*
  • Professional-Family Relations*
  • Qualitative Research
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Tracheostomy*