Performance of multiple docking and refinement methods in the pose prediction D3R prospective Grand Challenge 2016

J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2018 Jan;32(1):113-127. doi: 10.1007/s10822-017-0053-2. Epub 2017 Sep 14.

Abstract

We describe the performance of multiple pose prediction methods for the D3R 2016 Grand Challenge. The pose prediction challenge includes 36 ligands, which represent 4 chemotypes and some miscellaneous structures against the FXR ligand binding domain. In this study we use a mix of fully automated methods as well as human-guided methods with considerations of both the challenge data and publicly available data. The methods include ensemble docking, colony entropy pose prediction, target selection by molecular similarity, molecular dynamics guided pose refinement, and pose selection by visual inspection. We evaluated the success of our predictions by method, chemotype, and relevance of publicly available data. For the overall data set, ensemble docking, visual inspection, and molecular dynamics guided pose prediction performed the best with overall mean RMSDs of 2.4, 2.2, and 2.2 Å respectively. For several individual challenge molecules, the best performing method is evaluated in light of that particular ligand. We also describe the protein, ligand, and public information data preparations that are typical of our binding mode prediction workflow.

Keywords: D3R Grand Challenge 2016; Docking; FXR; Molecular dynamics; Pose prediction.

MeSH terms

  • Binding Sites
  • Computer-Aided Design*
  • Crystallography, X-Ray
  • Databases, Protein
  • Drug Design*
  • Drug Discovery*
  • Humans
  • Ligands
  • Molecular Docking Simulation*
  • Molecular Dynamics Simulation
  • Protein Binding
  • Protein Conformation
  • Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear / chemistry
  • Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear / metabolism*
  • Thermodynamics

Substances

  • Ligands
  • Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear
  • farnesoid X-activated receptor