[Occurrence of Ehrlichia canis in dogs living in Germany and comparison of direct and indirect diagnostic methods]

Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere. 2017 Oct 17;45(5):301-307. doi: 10.15654/TPK-170065. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Objective: To study the occurrence of Ehrlichia (E.) canis in dogs living in Germany and evaluate the possibilities and limits of direct and indirect diagnostic methods.

Material and methods: The first part of the study was a retrospective analysis of routine samples, which had been examined for E. canis antibodies using an indirect immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT). The examination was part of a laboratory profile for the detection of travel-related diseases (travel disease profile) or was performed on an individual basis. In the second part, samples which were examined within a travel disease profile, including E. canis antibodies, were further evaluated for E. canis DNA by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Medical histories were obtained of E. canis-positive dogs (animals which were positive in IFAT and/or PCR) and for a part of the negative animals.

Results: For 2015, 11.8% of 12220 samples had antibodies for E. canis. Dogs, which were examined with a travel disease profile, displayed antibodies in 5.6% cases of 1172 animals (investigation period February to March 2016). Of the E. canis-positive dogs (n = 67), 91% were positive with only the IFAT, 7.5% with the IFAT and PCR and 1.5% were only positive by PCR. Anamnesis showed that particularly imported dogs without symptoms were controlled for travel diseases during their first year in Germany.

Conclusion and clinical relevance: Although endemic E. canis infections play a minor role in Germany, infections with this pathogen are still of importance in this country, particularly because of the import of dogs. Therefore, a medical history helps in early ehrlichiosis diagnosis and to start an adequate treatment. Pathogen detection in imported E. canis-seropositive dogs, which often did not display clinical symptoms in this study, was frequently negative in blood samples by PCR. The diagnostic method should be chosen depending on the disease phase and the underlying question (symptoms or preventive screening).

Keywords: DNA; Ehrlichiosis; antibodies; diagnostic; prevalence.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Antibodies, Bacterial / blood
  • DNA, Bacterial / analysis
  • Dog Diseases / diagnosis*
  • Dog Diseases / epidemiology
  • Dog Diseases / microbiology*
  • Dogs
  • Ehrlichia canis / genetics
  • Ehrlichia canis / immunology
  • Ehrlichia canis / isolation & purification*
  • Ehrlichiosis / diagnosis
  • Ehrlichiosis / epidemiology
  • Ehrlichiosis / veterinary*
  • Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect / veterinary
  • Germany / epidemiology
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction / veterinary
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Travel

Substances

  • Antibodies, Bacterial
  • DNA, Bacterial