Long-Term Performance and User Satisfaction With Implanted Neuroprostheses for Upright Mobility After Paraplegia: 2- to 14-Year Follow-Up

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Feb;99(2):289-298. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.08.470. Epub 2017 Sep 9.

Abstract

Objective: To quantify the long-term (>2y) effects of lower extremity (LE) neuroprostheses (NPs) for standing, transfers, stepping, and seated stability after spinal cord injury.

Design: Single-subject design case series with participants acting as their own concurrent controls, including retrospective data review.

Setting: Hospital-based clinical biomechanics laboratory with experienced (>20y in the field) research biomedical engineers, a physical therapist, and medical monitoring review.

Participants: Long-term (6.2±2.7y) at-home users (N=22; 19 men, 3 women) of implanted NPs for trunk and LE function with chronic (14.4±7.1y) spinal cord injury resulting in full or partial paralysis.

Interventions: Technical and clinical performance measurements, along with user satisfaction surveys.

Main outcome measures: Knee extension moment, maximum standing time, body weight supported by lower extremities, 3 functional standing tasks, 2 satisfaction surveys, NP usage, and stability of implanted components.

Results: Stimulated knee extension strength and functional capabilities were maintained, with 94% of implant recipients reporting being very or moderately satisfied with their system. More than half (60%) of the participants were still using their implanted NPs for exercise and function for >10min/d on nearly half or more of the days monitored; however, maximum standing times and percentage body weight through LEs decreased slightly over the follow-up interval. Stimulus thresholds were uniformly stable. Six-year survival rates for the first-generation implanted pulse generator (IPG) and epimysial electrodes were close to 90%, whereas those for the second-generation IPG along with the intramuscular and nerve cuff electrodes were >98%.

Conclusions: Objective and subjective measures of the technical and clinical performances of implanted LE NPs generally remained consistent for 22 participants after an average of 6 years of unsupervised use at home. These findings suggest that implanted LE NPs can provide lasting benefits that recipients value.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00004445 NCT00623389 NCT01474148 NCT01570816.

Keywords: Electric stimulation; Lower extremity; Neural prostheses; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injuries.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Activities of Daily Living
  • Adult
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Lower Extremity / physiopathology*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neural Prostheses*
  • Paraplegia / physiopathology*
  • Paraplegia / rehabilitation*
  • Patient Satisfaction*
  • Posture / physiology*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Spinal Cord Injuries / physiopathology*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Treatment Outcome

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT00004445
  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT00623389
  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01474148
  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01570816