Systematic Review of School Scoliosis Screening

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to review the literature on school screening and its reported effectiveness.

Summary of background data: There is no worldwide consensus concerning the mandating of school screening for scoliosis. This remains a controversial issue.

Methods: The following databases were employed: Medline, Premedline, CINAHL, CENTRAL, AMED, Embase, SCOPUS, Ovid nursing, and Web of Science. These data were generated from the Forward Bend Test, the angle of trunk rotation and Moire topography. The first and second authors each independently screened titles and abstracts for potential studies. Fulltext papers of potential studies were also independently read by the first two authors to identify studies to be included based on strict inclusion/exclusion criteria. A heterogeneity test was performed by testing for the significance of the between-study variance. Publication bias was examined by a funnel plot.

Results: We found 20 studies that met our inclusion criteria. The pooled estimate of prevalence of scoliosis curves in the population was 1.1% for curves greater than 10°, and 0.2% for curves greater than 20°. The pooled referral rate to radiography during the screening process was 6.6%. The pooled positive predictive values for detecting curves >10° and >20° were 32.3% and 6.5% respectively. Analysis of data demonstrated significant heterogeneity between studies but was not suggestive of the presence of publication bias.

Conclusions: We support the implementation of scoliosis screening as a means of detecting curves at an early treatable stage. The current available evidence in the literature for routine scoliosis screening is low to moderate. Challenges exist to the school scoliosis screening including a high referral rate to radiology.

Keywords: Meta-analysis; School screening; Scoliosis.