Objective: To validate the feasibility of the estimation of pulse transit time (PTT) by artificial neural network (ANN) from radial pressure waveform alone.
Methods: A cascade ANN with ten-fold cross validation was applied to invasively and simultaneously recorded aortic and radial pressure waveforms during rest and nitroglycerin infusion () for the estimation of mean and beat-to-beat PTT. The results of the ANN models were compared to a multiple linear regression (LR) model when the features of radial arterial pressure waveform in time and frequency domains were used as the predictors of the models.
Results: For the estimation of mean PTT and beat-to-beat PTT by ANN ( ), the correlation coefficient between the and the measured PTT () (mean: ; beat-to-beat: ) is higher than that between the PTT estimated by LR ( ) and (mean: ; beat-to-beat: ). The standard deviation (SD) of the difference between the and ( ; beat-to-beat: ) is significantly less than that between the and (; beat-to-beat: 10 ms), but no significant difference exists between their mean ( ). The lack of frequency features of radial pressure waveform caused obvious reduction in the correlation coefficient and SD of the difference between the and . The performance of the ANN was improved by increasing the sample number but not by increasing the neuron number.
Conclusion: ANN is a potential method of PTT estimation from a single pressure measurement at radial artery.