Curriculum Redesign in Veterinary Medicine: Part II

J Vet Med Educ. 2017 Fall;44(3):563-569. doi: 10.3138/jvme.0316-066R1.

Abstract

Curricular review is considered a necessary component for growth and enhancement of academic programs and requires time, energy, creativity, and persistence from both faculty and administration. On a larger scale, a comprehensive redesign effort involves forming a dedicated faculty redesign team, developing program learning outcomes, mapping the existing curriculum, and reviewing the curriculum in light of collected stakeholder data. The faculty of the Texas A&M University College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences (TAMU) recently embarked on a comprehensive curriculum redesign effort through partnership with the university's Center for Teaching Excellence. Using a previously developed evidence-based model of program redesign, TAMU created a process for use in veterinary medical education, which is described in detail in the first part of this article series. An additional component of the redesign process that is understated, yet vital for success, is faculty buy-in and support. Without faculty engagement, implementation of data-driven curricular changes stemming from program evaluation may be challenging. This second part of the article series describes the methodology for encouraging faculty engagement through the final steps of the redesign initiative and the lessons learned by TAMU through the redesign process.

Keywords: curriculum redesign; data analysis; faculty engagement; stakeholder data.

MeSH terms

  • Curriculum / trends*
  • Education, Medical / organization & administration*
  • Education, Medical / standards
  • Education, Veterinary / organization & administration*
  • Education, Veterinary / standards
  • Faculty, Medical*
  • Humans
  • Organizational Innovation
  • Program Evaluation
  • Texas