Tempo and rates of diversification in the South American cichlid genus Apistogramma (Teleostei: Perciformes: Cichlidae)

PLoS One. 2017 Sep 5;12(9):e0182618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182618. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Evaluating biodiversity and understanding the processes involved in diversification are noticeable conservation issues in fishes subject to large, sometimes illegal, ornamental trade purposes. Here, the diversity and evolutionary history of the Neotropical dwarf cichlid genus Apistogramma from several South American countries are investigated. Mitochondrial and nuclear markers are used to infer phylogenetic relationships between 31 genetically identified species. The monophyly of Apistogramma is suggested, and Apistogramma species are distributed into four clades, corresponding to three morphological lineages. Divergence times estimated with the Yule process and an uncorrelated lognormal clock dated the Apistogramma origin to the beginning of the Eocene (≈ 50 Myr) suggesting that diversification might be related to marine incursions. Our molecular dating also suggests that the Quaternary glacial cycles coincide with the phases leading to Apistogramma speciation. These past events did not influence diversification rates in the speciose genus Apistogramma, since diversification appeared low and constant through time. Further characterization of processes involved in recent Apistogramma diversity will be necessary.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Biodiversity*
  • Cichlids / physiology*
  • Cytochromes b / genetics
  • Electron Transport Complex IV / genetics
  • Haplotypes / genetics
  • Likelihood Functions
  • Phylogeny
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • South America
  • Species Specificity
  • Time Factors

Substances

  • Cytochromes b
  • Electron Transport Complex IV

Grants and funding

ISEM (Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution de Montpellier) and LMI EDIA (Laboratoire Mixte International - Evolution et Domestication de l’Ichtyofaune Amazonienne.) financially supported this work. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.