Reliability and concurrent validity of standardized walking obstacle course test in people with stroke

J Rehabil Med. 2017 Nov 21;49(9):705-714. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2265.

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate: (i) the intra-rater, inter-rater and test-retest reliabilities of completion times and step counts on the Standardized Walking Obstacle Course test (SWOC); (ii) correlations between SWOC scores and stroke-specific impairments; (iii) the cut-off SWOC completion times and step counts for distinguishing differences in obstacle negotiation ability in people with chronic stroke and healthy older adults.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: University-based rehabilitation centre.

Subjects: Twenty-nine people with stroke and 30 healthy older adults.

Methods: SWOC completion times and step counts were measured under 3 conditions: (i) normal walking; (ii) walking with a tray; and (iii) walking with dark-glasses. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of lower extremity, the Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand Test, the Berg Balance Scale, the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), and the Community Integration Measure questionnaire, were also administered.

Results: SWOC completion times and step counts showed very satisfactory to excellent reliabilities (intraclass correlation coefficient; ICC = 0.851-0.993). TUG times correlated significantly with SWOC completion times and step counts under the 3 conditions (r = 0.586-0.815, p < 0.001). SWOC completion times of 14.73-16.00 s and step counts of 23.06-24.13, depending on different walking conditions, were able to discriminate between stroke survivors and healthy older adults.

Conclusion: The SWOC is a reliable clinical tool for assessing obstacle negotiation ability in people with stroke.

MeSH terms

  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Disability Evaluation*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Stroke / therapy*
  • Stroke Rehabilitation / methods*
  • Walking / physiology*