A randomized trial found online questionnaires supplemented by postal reminders generated a cost-effective and generalizable sample but don't forget the reminders

J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Dec:92:116-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the response rates, data completeness, and representativeness of survey data produced by online and postal surveys.

Study design and setting: A randomized trial nested within a cohort study in Yorkshire, United Kingdom. Participants were randomized to receive either an electronic (online) survey questionnaire with paper reminder (N = 2,982) or paper questionnaire with electronic reminder (N = 2,855).

Results: Response rates were similar for electronic contact and postal contacts (50.9% vs. 49.7%, difference = 1.2%, 95% confidence interval: -1.3% to 3.8%). The characteristics of those responding to the two groups were similar. Participants nevertheless demonstrated an overwhelming preference for postal questionnaires, with the majority responding by post in both groups.

Conclusion: Online survey questionnaire systems need to be supplemented with a postal reminder to achieve acceptable uptake, but doing so provides a similar response rate and case mix when compared to postal questionnaires alone. For large surveys, online survey systems may be cost saving.

Keywords: EDC; Electronic data capture; External validity; Questionnaires; RCTs; Response rates; Surveys.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Cohort Studies
  • Confidence Intervals
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Electronic Mail / economics*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Online Systems / economics
  • Patient Selection*
  • Postal Service / economics*
  • Postal Service / statistics & numerical data
  • Reminder Systems
  • Surveys and Questionnaires*
  • United Kingdom
  • Writing
  • Young Adult