Gender differences and similarities in medical students' experiences of mistreatment by various groups of perpetrators

BMC Med Educ. 2017 Aug 14;17(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0974-4.

Abstract

Background: Mistreatment of medical students during medical education is a widespread concern. Studies have shown that medical students report the most mistreatment compared to students of other study programs and that the prevalence of mistreatment peaks during clinical training. For this reason, a study was conducted to assess prevalence of mistreatment among medical students committed by various groups of people. The focus was to identify whether gender was associated with the experience of mistreatment. Additionally, students' perception of university climate for reporting sexual harassment was assessed.

Method: In the study 88 medical students (45 women, 43 men) participated. A modified version of the Questionnaire on Student Abuse was used to assess students' experience of various types of mistreatment and associated distress during medical education. To explore factors that could be associated with this experience the organizational climate for reporting sexual harassment was assessed with the Psychological Climate for Sexual Harassment.

Result: The most often cited perpetrators of mistreatment were strangers (79.5%), friends (75.0%) and university staff (68.2%). Strangers mostly committed psychological mistreatment and sexual harassment, whereas friends additionally engaged in physical mistreatment of medical students. The most common form of mistreatment conducted by university staff was humiliation of students. These kinds of psychological mistreatment were reported to be distressing (43%). Gender differences were found in the prevalence of mistreatment. Women experienced more sexual harassment and humiliation than did men. On the other hand, men experienced more physical mistreatment than did women. Women reported experiencing more distress from mistreatment experiences than did men and also more often reported being mistreated by university staff than did men. Women perceived a greater risk in reporting sexual harassment to the organization than did men.

Conclusion: Mistreatment of female and male students should be focused on using a gender perspective because types of mistreatment can differ by gender. Additionally, interventions should include the societal level as there was a high prevalence of mistreatment perpetrated by strangers. Also the issue of trust in the university needs to be addressed and the organization is called on to visibly demonstrate that it represents and protects its students as well as its staff.

Keywords: Medical students; Medical university; Mistreatment of students; Psychological mistreatment.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Attitude of Health Personnel
  • Austria
  • Education, Medical, Undergraduate*
  • Faculty, Medical
  • Female
  • Health Surveys
  • Humans
  • Interpersonal Relations
  • Male
  • Occupational Health*
  • Prejudice / psychology*
  • Prejudice / statistics & numerical data
  • Prevalence
  • Professional Misconduct* / psychology
  • Professional Misconduct* / statistics & numerical data
  • Sex Factors
  • Sexual Harassment / psychology*
  • Sexual Harassment / statistics & numerical data
  • Social Behavior
  • Stress, Psychological
  • Students, Medical / psychology*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Young Adult