Why Has a Run-In Period Been a Design Element in Most Landmark Clinical Trials? Analysis of the Critical Role of Run-In Periods in Drug Development

J Card Fail. 2017 Sep;23(9):697-699. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.07.401. Epub 2017 Jul 28.

Abstract

Prior exposure to one of the randomized treatments has been a routine design element of large-scale trials in patients at high cardiovascular risk. A run-in feature has allowed our trials to be more realistic; it has strengthened their ability to estimate the true treatment effect; and it has never undermined the validity of a trial's findings. Those who suggest that run-in periods distort the results of large-scale trials should become more familiar with our history of drug development and our standards of clinical practice. Physicians use run-in periods every day in real life, and trialists have used run-in periods for decades to reliably establish the role of new cardiovascular drugs. Those who reflexively criticize the trials because of their inclusion of a run-in period need to carefully reexamine how medicine is practiced and how it advances.

Keywords: Clinical trial design; drug efficacy studies; heart failure trials; run-in periods.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Cardiovascular Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Clinical Trials as Topic / methods*
  • Drug Discovery / methods*
  • Drug Discovery / trends
  • Heart Failure / diagnosis
  • Heart Failure / drug therapy*
  • Humans
  • Patient Selection*
  • Research Design / trends

Substances

  • Cardiovascular Agents