The 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) recommendations for HER2 testing contain a recommendation for pathologists with respect to invasive micropapillary carcinoma. The guidelines suggest that HER2 immunohistochemical staining that is intense but incomplete and would be considered 1+ may actually be HER2-amplified by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Thus, pathologists should consider reporting the immunohistochemistry as equivocal (2+) and employ an alternative testing methodology. This recommendation is based largely on one paper wherein the authors tested a series of 22 micropapillary carcinomas that were considered 1+ by immunohistochemistry and identified HER2 amplification in one case (5%). In order to assess for a possible discordance between HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization, we evaluated a series of invasive carcinomas with micropapillary features using both methodologies. As described by the WHO, invasive carcinomas with micropapillary features have small, hollow, or morula-like clusters of cells surrounded by clear stromal spaces. All cases had HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization performed, and for cases with equivocal fluorescence in situ hybridization results, an alternative Chromosome 17 probe (RAI1) was employed. All assays were scored according to the 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines. Specifically for this study, immunohistochemistry was scored irrespective of the presence of micropapillary features. Overall, we identified HER2 amplification in 21 (47%) of the cases assayed, with the corresponding immunohistochemistry being 1+ (n=9), 2+ (n=11), and 3+ (n=1). The ASCO/CAP recommendation that this morphology may deviate from the typical staining pattern is highlighted, as we found that 43% of cases with micropapillary features and HER2 staining that would otherwise be scored as 1+ were HER2-amplified by fluorescence in situ hybridization. This study supports the ASCO/CAP recommendation that pathologists should consider reporting immunohistochemistry in this morphology as equivocal and perform reflex testing using in situ hybridization.