Do cultures vary in self-enhancement? ERP, behavioral, and self-report evidence

Soc Neurosci. 2018 Oct;13(5):566-578. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2017.1361471. Epub 2017 Aug 2.

Abstract

Psychologists have long debated whether self-enhancement is universal or varies across cultures. Extant studies using explicit and implicit measures have provided mixed results. In this study (N = 93; 35 European American, 58 Chinese: 28 tested in English, 30 tested in Mandarin), we measured self-enhancement covertly using an ERP paradigm. Self-enhancement was also assessed via self-report and reaction-time based measures. Americans showed strong evidence of self-enhancement across all measures, whereas this effect was absent or weaker among Chinese, who instead showed an other-enhancing bias across measures. Language did not affect self-enhancement tendencies among Chinese participants, with the exception of one self-report measure. Nor did the two cultural groups differ in enhancement for a close other. This is the first study to directly compare self-enhancement across cultural groups using ERPs and provides evidence that positive self-regard does indeed vary by culture.

Keywords: Culture; ERP; N400; cultural neuroscience; self-enhancement.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Asian People / ethnology
  • Asian People / psychology*
  • Cross-Cultural Comparison*
  • Electroencephalography / methods
  • Evoked Potentials / physiology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Photic Stimulation / methods
  • Psychomotor Performance / physiology
  • Reaction Time / physiology
  • Self Concept*
  • Self Report*
  • White People / ethnology
  • White People / psychology*
  • Young Adult