Adaptation and validation into Portuguese language of the six-item cognitive impairment test (6CIT)

Aging Ment Health. 2018 Sep;22(9):1184-1189. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1348473. Epub 2017 Jul 25.

Abstract

Background: The six-item cognitive impairment test (6CIT) is a brief cognitive screening tool that can be administered to older people in 2-3 min.

Objective: To adapt the 6CIT for the European Portuguese and determine its psychometric properties based on a sample recruited from several contexts (nursing homes; universities for older people; day centres; primary health care units).

Method: The original 6CIT was translated into Portuguese and the draft Portuguese version (6CIT-P) was back-translated and piloted. The accuracy of the 6CIT-P was assessed by comparison with the Portuguese Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). A convenience sample of 550 older people from various geographical locations in the north and centre of the country was used.

Results: The test-retest reliability coefficient was high (r = 0.95). The 6CIT-P also showed good internal consistency (α = 0.88) and corrected item-total correlations ranged between 0.32 and 0.90. Total 6CIT-P and MMSE scores were strongly correlated. The proposed 6CIT-P threshold for cognitive impairment is ≥10 in the Portuguese population, which gives sensitivity of 82.78% and specificity of 84.84%. The accuracy of 6CIT-P, as measured by area under the ROC curve, was 0.91.

Conclusion: The 6CIT-P has high reliability and validity and is accurate when used to screen for cognitive impairment.

Keywords: Cognitive impairment; dementia; screening; six-item cognitive impairment test.

Publication types

  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cognitive Dysfunction / diagnosis*
  • Dementia / diagnosis*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mental Status and Dementia Tests
  • Neuropsychological Tests / standards*
  • Portugal
  • Psychometrics / instrumentation
  • Psychometrics / methods
  • Psychometrics / standards*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity