Escherichia coli mastitis strains: In vitro phenotypes and severity of infection in vivo

PLoS One. 2017 Jul 20;12(7):e0178285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178285. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Mastitis remains a major infection of dairy cows and an important issue for dairy farmers and the dairy industry, in particular infections due to Escherichia coli strains. So far, properties specific to E. coli causing mastitis remain ill defined. In an attempt to better understand the properties required for E. coli to trigger mastitis, we used a range of in vitro assays to phenotypically characterize four E. coli strains, including the prototypical E. coli mastitis strain P4, possessing different relative abilities to cause mastitis in a mouse model. Our results indicate that a certain level of serum resistance might be required for colonization of the mammary gland. Resistance to neutrophil killing is also likely to contribute to a slower clearance of bacteria and higher chances to colonize the udder. In addition, we show that the four different strains do induce a pro-inflammatory response by mammary epithelial cells but with different intensities. Interestingly, the prototypical mastitis strain P4 actually induces the less intense response while it is responsible for the most severe infections in vivo. Altogether, our results suggest that different strategies can be used by E. coli strains to colonize the mammary gland and cause mastitis.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Cattle
  • Escherichia coli / genetics
  • Escherichia coli / isolation & purification*
  • Escherichia coli Infections / diagnosis
  • Escherichia coli Infections / microbiology
  • Escherichia coli Infections / veterinary*
  • Female
  • Mammary Glands, Animal / microbiology*
  • Mastitis, Bovine / diagnosis*
  • Mastitis, Bovine / microbiology
  • Phenotype
  • Severity of Illness Index

Grants and funding

Dr P. Roussel was recipient of a grant from the “Microbiology and Food Chain” and “Animal Health” divisions of INRA. This work was supported by grants from the IFR136 “Agents Transmissibles et Infectiologie” and from the GISA metaprogram (RUMINFLAME project). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.