Is it necessary to perform full pathologic review of all gastric remnants following sleeve gastrectomy?

Am J Surg. 2017 Dec;214(6):1151-1155. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.06.029. Epub 2017 Jul 1.

Abstract

Background: This study attempts to determine if enough pathological abnormalities in gastric remnants from sleeve gastrectomy exist to warrant full pathologic evaluation in all remnants.

Methods: Data was collected on patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy between 08/01/2011 and 06/30/2014. Significant abnormalities were classified as any pathology that might require follow-up or treatment beyond standard follow-up. Age, comorbidities, gender, and Helicobacter pylori titers were analyzed and compared with pathology specimens using 95% confidence intervals and Phi contingency coefficients.

Results: Full pathologic evaluation was available for 351/387 patients (91.2%). No examples of malignancy or dysplasia were identified. Gastritis was the most common abnormality. There was a statistically significant association between preoperative H. pylori and significantly abnormal pathology (p = 0.003). Other comorbidities had no association.

Conclusions: These results suggest that full pathologic evaluation of the gastric remnant following sleeve gastrectomy is unnecessary, particularly when gross pathology is not noted at initial operation.

Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Gastric remnant pathology; Obesity co-morbidity; Sleeve gastrectomy.

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Gastrectomy / methods*
  • Gastric Stump / pathology*
  • Gastritis / microbiology
  • Gastritis / pathology
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Obesity, Morbid / surgery*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stomach Diseases / microbiology
  • Stomach Diseases / pathology*
  • Unnecessary Procedures