Aims: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).
Material and methods: The effectiveness and safety of endoscopic resection were mainly assessed by complete resection rate, postoperative adverse event rate, and recurrence rate. Moreover, a comparison of endoscopic with laparoscopic resection for gastric GISTs was made through weighted mean difference by STATA 12.0 with regard to operation time, blood loss, and length of stay after including patients who underwent endoscopic or laparoscopic resection for gastric GISTs in the comparative studies.
Results: Eleven studies investigating endoscopic resection for GISTs were included. For stromal tumors <2 cm in average diameters the pooled rates of complete resection, postoperative adverse events and recurrence were 0.97, 0.08, and 0.03, respectively. Only five retrospective studies directly compared endoscopic with laparoscopic resection for gastric GISTs with average diameters from 1.1 cm to 3.8 cm, and endoscopic resection had a shorter operation time than laparoscopic resection, but there were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, length of stay, postoperative complications, and postoperative recurrence rates between the two approaches.
Conclusions: Endoscopic resection is predominantly tried for gastric GISTs of relatively small size. It seems effective and safe for gastric GISTs <2 cm in average diameter, with relatively short operation times.
Keywords: Endoscopic resection; gastrointestinal stromal tumors; laparoscopic resection; meta-analysis; systematic review.