A bibliometric analysis of the citation classics of acute appendicitis

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Jun 6:19:45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.05.034. eCollection 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: Acute appendicitis is one of the most commonly encountered emergency surgical conditions. An understanding of the most highly cited research works in this field is key to good evidence based clinical practice.

Aims: To perform a bibliometric analysis on the 100 most frequently cited articles in the field of acute appendicitis.

Methods: The database of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Web of Science Expanded citation index was searched to identify the 100 most frequently cited articles in the field of acute appendicitis. The web of science expanded citation index tracks article citations made since 1946.

Results: The top 100 most frequently cited articles were selected for analysis in this series. The most frequently cited article was cited 649 times and the least cited three article 93 times. The average number of citations per article was 167.74. The top 100 cited articles originated from 17 countries. Over half of the papers originated from the USA. Fifty-one of the papers concentrated on diagnostics of acute appendicitis. Thirty-six papers looked at the treatment of acute appendicitis with 30 of these dealing with the surgical management of the disease. There were 6 studies at level 1a, 20 studies at level 1b and 43,5,17 and 9 studies at levels 2, 3, 4 and 5 respectively.

Conclusions: Bibliometric analysis of the citation classics in a given field can provide interesting insights into the relationship between the quality of research outputs and clinical practice. The study of acute appendicitis remains an active field of research with a growing body of higher quality evidence underpinning our clinical practice.

Keywords: Acute appendicitis; Bibliometrics; Citation; Levels of evidence.

Publication types

  • Review