Cost-effectiveness analysis of two treatment strategies for chronic hepatitis C before and after access to direct-acting antivirals in Spain

Juan Turnes; Raquel Domínguez-Hernández; Miguel Ángel Casado

doi:10.1016/j.gastrohep.2017.05.004

Cost-effectiveness analysis of two treatment strategies for chronic hepatitis C before and after access to direct-acting antivirals in Spain

Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Aug-Sep;40(7):433-446. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 Jun 21.

[Article in English, Spanish]

Authors

Juan Turnes¹, Raquel Domínguez-Hernández², Miguel Ángel Casado²

Affiliations

¹ Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur, Pontevedra, España. Electronic address: jturnesv@gmail.com.
² Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), Madrid, España.

PMID: 28645446
DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2017.05.004

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a strategy based on direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) following the marketing of simeprevir and sofosbuvir (post-DAA) versus a pre-direct-acting antiviral strategy (pre-DAA) in patients with chronic hepatitis C, from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System.

Methods: A decision tree combined with a Markov model was used to estimate the direct health costs (€, 2016) and health outcomes (quality-adjusted life years, QALYs) throughout the patient's life, with an annual discount rate of 3%. The sustained virological response, percentage of patients treated or not treated in each strategy, clinical characteristics of the patients, annual likelihood of transition, costs of treating and managing the disease, and utilities were obtained from the literature. The cost-effectiveness analysis was expressed as an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (incremental cost per QALY gained). A deterministic sensitivity analysis and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed.

Results: The post-DAA strategy showed higher health costs per patient (€30,944 vs. €23,707) than the pre-DAA strategy. However, it was associated with an increase of QALYs gained (15.79 vs. 12.83), showing an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €2,439 per QALY. The deterministic sensitivity analysis and the probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed the robustness of the results, with the post-DAA strategy being cost-effective in 99% of cases compared to the pre-DAA strategy.

Conclusions: Compared to the pre-DAA strategy, the post-DAA strategy is efficient for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Spain, resulting in a much lower cost per QALY than the efficiency threshold used in Spain (€30,000 per QALY).

Keywords: Antivirales de acción directa; Análisis coste-efectividad.; Chronic hepatitis C; Cost-effectiveness analysis.; Direct-acting antiviral; Hepatitis C crónica; National Strategic Plan for Hepatitis C; Plan estratégico para el abordaje de la hepatitis C.