Differential diagnosis between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors utilizing ultrasound parameters

J Med Ultrason (2001). 2018 Jan;45(1):113-119. doi: 10.1007/s10396-017-0796-3. Epub 2017 Jun 20.

Abstract

Purpose: Preoperative discrimination between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors is critical for the prevention of excess application of magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy as well as unplanned resection. Although ultrasound, including power Doppler imaging, is an easy, noninvasive, and cost-effective modality for screening soft tissue tumors, few studies have investigated reliable discrimination between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors.

Methods: To establish a modality for discrimination between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors using ultrasound, we extracted the significant risk factors for malignancy based on ultrasound information from 40 malignant and 56 benign pathologically diagnosed soft tissue tumors and established a scoring system based on these risk factors.

Results: The maximum size, tumor margin, and vascularity evaluated using ultrasound were extracted as significant risk factors. Using the odds ratio from a multivariate regression model, a scoring system was established. Receiver operating characteristic analyses revealed a high area under the curve value (0.85), confirming the accuracy of the scoring system.

Conclusion: Ultrasound is a useful modality for establishing the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors.

Keywords: Diagnosis; Soft tissue tumor; Ultrasonography.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neurilemmoma / diagnostic imaging
  • Neurilemmoma / pathology
  • Sarcoma / diagnostic imaging
  • Sarcoma / pathology
  • Soft Tissue Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
  • Soft Tissue Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Ultrasonography / methods*
  • Young Adult