Ultrapure versus standard dialysate: A cost-benefit analysis

Semin Dial. 2017 Sep;30(5):398-402. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12618. Epub 2017 Jun 13.

Abstract

Low-level bacterial and endotoxin contamination of water used to generate dialysate propagates chronic inflammation in patients with a wide-range of potential adverse consequences, including erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness. Advancements in hemodialysis systems now allow for the generation of ultrapure dialysate that has lower bacterial and endotoxin levels than the standard dialysate. The cost associated with ultrapure dialysate is thought to be a major barrier to its widespread adoption. In this report, we conduct a cost-benefit analysis examining the excess cost of generating ultrapure dialysate and the potential cost saving from a lower erythropoietin dose requirement. Our analysis suggests a potential cost saving of approximately $371 to $425 million per year with full adoption of ultrapure dialysate in the United States.

Keywords: cost-benefit; hemodialysis; ultrapure dialysate.

Publication types

  • Editorial

MeSH terms

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Erythropoietin / administration & dosage
  • Erythropoietin / economics
  • Hemodialysis Solutions / adverse effects
  • Hemodialysis Solutions / chemistry
  • Hemodialysis Solutions / economics*
  • Humans
  • Renal Dialysis / adverse effects
  • Renal Dialysis / economics*
  • United States

Substances

  • EPO protein, human
  • Hemodialysis Solutions
  • Erythropoietin