Exploring shared risks through public-private partnerships in public health programs: a mixed method

BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 12;17(1):571. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4489-z.

Abstract

Background: The natural assimilation of the process through which health partners sustain long-term relationships is a key issue in maintaining social well-being, reducing health risk factors, and sustaining public health programs. One global initiative in building effective healthcare systems is public-private partnerships (PPPs). This study elucidates the proposed key performance indicators initiated by the Ministry of Health of Saudi Arabia based on the projections of the government, known as Vision 2030, from the perspective of health risk factors.

Methods: Through an inductive content analysis, this study assessed primary and secondary data in relation to the Saudi National Transformation Program (NTP). To identify the institutions that played a role in formulating the new Saudi Healthcare System, health policies, regulations, and reports published between 1996 and 2016 were categorized. After ranking the risk factors, the investigator selected 13 healthcare professionals in four focus group interviews to insightfully explore the challenges that the NTP faces from a health risk perspective. Thus, the study employed qualitative data gathered through focus group interviews with key figures as well as data extracted from written sources to identify distinct but interrelated partnerships practiced within risk management.

Results: A methodological overview of NTP priority and implementation offered practical guidance in the healthcare context. The five critical factors in maintaining successful and sustainable PPPs were (1) trustworthiness, (2) technological capability, (3) patient-centeredness, (4) competence, and (5) flexibility. Concession on primary and secondary healthcare services might be a good option based on the literature review and considering its popularity in other countries. A high outcome-based risk of PPPs was found as the most commonly shared perspective in risk management.

Conclusions: Although the impact of the NTP rise has yet to be explored, its potential for challenging health consequences requires consideration and substantial regulatory action. This study contributes to the emerging critical analysis on local health initiatives by highlighting how integration may only be possible with a more radical conceptualization of national health governance.

Keywords: Public health programs; Public-private partnerships; Risk shared; Saudi national transformation program; Vision 2030.

MeSH terms

  • Attitude of Health Personnel
  • Clinical Competence
  • Delivery of Health Care / organization & administration
  • Focus Groups
  • Health Policy
  • Humans
  • Patient-Centered Care / organization & administration
  • Public Health Administration*
  • Public-Private Sector Partnerships / organization & administration*
  • Risk
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Trust