The importance of the relationship between mechanical analyses and rheometry of mucoadhesive thermoresponsive polymeric materials for biomedical applications

J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Oct:74:142-153. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.05.040. Epub 2017 Jun 2.

Abstract

Pluronic F127® was associated with a carbomer homopolymer type B, as a model polymer blend to evidence the information provided by rheological and mechanical analyses on the development of bioadhesive thermoresponsive systems. The mechanical analysis enabled to observe that 20% (w/w) Pluronic F127®-polymer blends were harder, more adhesive, more mucoadhesive, more compressive and less soft. In addition, continuous flow rheometry demonstrated that the systems were plastic with rheopexy (15%, w/w, Pluronic F127®) or thixotropic (20%, w/w, Pluronic F127®). Oscillatory rheometry exhibited the increase of temperature, and the polymeric concentration increases the elasticity of the formulations. Moreover, correlation index showed that softness and textural analysis can be correlated and complementary, whereas adhesiveness cannot be correlated to mucoadhesion and is less specific. Rheological interaction parameter and gelation temperature showed that 15/0.25-polymer blend is suitable for pharmaceutical and biomedical application, since it can be administered in the liquid form and be gelled in the application site with proper mucoadhesion that can suggest an improved clinical efficacy. Therefore, the mechanical and rheological analyses are useful to characterize and select the best bioadhesive thermoresponsive formulation for the proposed treatment with improved performance.

Keywords: Carbomer; Mucoadhesion; Pluronic F127; Rheology; Softness index; Texture profile analysis.

MeSH terms

  • Adhesiveness
  • Biocompatible Materials / analysis*
  • Elasticity
  • Gels
  • Poloxamer / analysis*
  • Rheology*

Substances

  • Biocompatible Materials
  • Gels
  • Poloxamer