[11C]Erlotinib PET cannot detect acquired erlotinib resistance in NSCLC tumor xenografts in mice

Nucl Med Biol. 2017 Sep:52:7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 25.

Abstract

Introduction: [11C]Erlotinib PET has shown promise to distinguish non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors harboring the activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation delE746-A750 from tumors with wild-type EGFR. To assess the suitability of [11C]erlotinib PET to detect the emergence of acquired erlotinib resistance in initially erlotinib-responsive tumors, we performed in vitro binding and PET experiments in mice bearing tumor xenografts using a range of different cancer cells, which were erlotinib-sensitive or exhibited clinically relevant resistance mechanisms to erlotinib.

Methods: The following cell lines were used for in vitro binding and PET experiments: the epidermoid carcinoma cell line A-431 (erlotinib-sensitive, wild-type EGFR) and the three NSCLC cell lines HCC827 (erlotinib-sensitive, delE746-A750), HCC827EPR (erlotinib-resistant, delE746-A750 and T790M) and HCC827ERLO (erlotinib-resistant, delE746-A750 and MET amplification). BALB/c nude mice with subcutaneous tumor xenografts underwent two consecutive [11C]erlotinib PET scans, a baseline scan and a second scan in which unlabeled erlotinib (10mg/kg) was co-injected. Logan graphical analysis was used to estimate total distribution volume (VT) of [11C]erlotinib in tumors.

Results: In vitro experiments revealed significantly higher uptake of [11C]erlotinib (5.2-fold) in the three NSCLC cell lines as compared to A-431 cells. In all four cell lines co-incubation with unlabeled erlotinib (1μM) led to significant reductions in [11C]erlotinib uptake (-19% to -66%). In both PET scans and for all four studied cell lines there were no significant differences in tumoral [11C]erlotinib VT values. For all three NSCLC cell lines, but not for the A-431 cell line, tumoral VT was significantly reduced following co-injection of unlabeled erlotinib (-20% to -35%).

Conclusions: We found no significant differences in the in vitro and in vivo binding of [11C]erlotinib between erlotinib-sensitive and erlotinib-resistant NSCLC cells. Our findings suggest that [11C]erlotinib PET will not be suitable to distinguish erlotinib-sensitive NSCLC tumors from tumors with acquired resistance to erlotinib.

Keywords: Acquired resistance; Epidermal growth factor receptor; MET amplification; Non-small cell lung cancer; T790M; [(11)C]erlotinib.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / diagnostic imaging*
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / drug therapy
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / metabolism
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / pathology
  • Cell Line, Tumor
  • Cell Transformation, Neoplastic*
  • Drug Resistance, Neoplasm*
  • ErbB Receptors / metabolism
  • Erlotinib Hydrochloride* / metabolism
  • Female
  • Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic / drug effects
  • Humans
  • Lung Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
  • Lung Neoplasms / drug therapy
  • Lung Neoplasms / metabolism
  • Lung Neoplasms / pathology
  • Mice
  • Positron-Emission Tomography*

Substances

  • Erlotinib Hydrochloride
  • EGFR protein, human
  • ErbB Receptors