Examining the Association between Hemodialysis Access Type and Mortality: The Role of Access Complications

Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Jun 7;12(6):955-964. doi: 10.2215/CJN.12181116. Epub 2017 May 18.

Abstract

Background and objectives: People receiving hemodialysis to treat kidney failure need a vascular access (a fistula, a graft, or a central venous catheter) to connect to the blood purification machine. Higher rates of access complications are considered the mechanism responsible for the excess mortality observed among catheter or graft users versus fistula users. We tested this hypothesis using mediation analysis.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: We studied incident patients who started hemodialysis therapy from North America, Europe, and Australasia (the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study; 1996-2011). We evaluated the association between access type and time to noninfectious (e.g., thrombosis) and infectious complications of the access (mediator model) and the relationship between access type and time-dependent access complications with 6-month mortality from the creation of the first permanent access (outcome model). In mediation analysis, we formally tested whether access complications explain the association between access type and mortality.

Results: Of the 6119 adults that we studied (mean age =64 [SD=15] years old; 58% men; 47% patients with diabetes), 50% had a permanent catheter for vascular access, 37% had a fistula, and 13% had a graft. During the 6-month study follow-up, 2084 participants (34%) developed a noninfectious complication of the access, 542 (8.9%) developed an infectious complication, and 526 (8.6%) died. Access type predicted the occurrence of access complications; both access type and complications predicted mortality. The associations between access type and mortality were nearly identical in models excluding and including access complications (hazard ratio, 2.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.55 to 2.58 versus hazard ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.56 to 2.59 for catheter versus fistula, respectively). In mediation analysis, higher mortality with catheters or grafts versus fistulas was not the result of increased rates of access complications.

Conclusions: Hemodialysis access complications do not seem to explain the association between access type and mortality. Clinical trials are needed to clarify whether these associations are causal or reflect confounding by underlying disease severity.

Keywords: Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical; Australasia; Central Venous Catheters; Europe; Fistula; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; North America; Renal Insufficiency; diabetes mellitus; renal dialysis; thrombosis.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical / adverse effects
  • Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical / mortality*
  • Australasia
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / adverse effects
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / mortality*
  • Catheter Obstruction / etiology
  • Catheter-Related Infections / etiology
  • Catheter-Related Infections / mortality
  • Catheterization, Central Venous / adverse effects
  • Catheterization, Central Venous / mortality*
  • Europe
  • Female
  • Graft Occlusion, Vascular / etiology
  • Graft Occlusion, Vascular / mortality
  • Humans
  • Kidney Diseases / diagnosis
  • Kidney Diseases / mortality
  • Kidney Diseases / therapy*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • North America
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / etiology
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / mortality
  • Renal Dialysis / adverse effects
  • Renal Dialysis / mortality*
  • Risk Factors
  • Thrombosis / etiology
  • Thrombosis / mortality
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome