Beyond Hat in Hand: Science Advocacy Is Foundational for Policy Decisions

Nathaniel Kendall-Taylor; Pat Levitt

doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.04.039

Beyond Hat in Hand: Science Advocacy Is Foundational for Policy Decisions

Neuron. 2017 May 17;94(4):708-712. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.04.039.

Authors

Nathaniel Kendall-Taylor¹, Pat Levitt²

Affiliations

¹ FrameWorks Institute, Washington, DC 20005, USA.
² Institute for the Developing Mind, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA. Electronic address: plevitt@med.usc.edu.

PMID: 28521125
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.04.039

Abstract

Beyond those to whom neuroscientists typically communicate exciting discoveries-that is, those who can provide more funding for researchers-there are important audiences that are positioned to use neuroscience findings to affect policy and improve societal outcomes. Showing the utility of research that policymakers, service providers, and the public can use to make decisions will enhance views of the value of scientific research. The ingredients of successful communications between neuroscientists and other stakeholders are different from those that characterize effective communications between scientists. Here, we discuss our experiences in the communication of the science of early childhood and brain development and our recommendations to help neuroscientists better communicate the benefits of their research to those who make practice and policy decisions.

Keywords: advocacy; brain development; child development; framing; metaphors; neuroscience; policymakers; science communication.

MeSH terms

Administrative Personnel
Brain / growth & development*
Child
Child Development*
Communication*
Consumer Advocacy
Humans
Metaphor
Neurosciences*
Public Policy*
Social Values