Background: Zygoma fracture is of clinical importance because malar prominence plays an essential role in facial appearance. Traditionally, most maxillofacial surgeons perform osteosynthesis with titanium plates and screws for rigid fixation. However, this procedure has certain disadvantages that include the possibility of implant exposure, palpability or loosening of the screws, painful irritation, temperature sensitization, and radiographic artifacts. In this study, we compared the function and satisfaction outcome between Bonamates® bioabsorbable implant and Leibinger titanium implant.
Method: Consecutively 53 patients with isolated unilateral zygomatic fracture that were treated with the Bonamates® bioabsorbable plate system, n = 53 were compared to patients with the titanium plate system, n = 55 in the period between 2009 and 2013. All patients were followed-up at least 6 months. Preoperative and postoperative facial computed tomography (CT) scans were performed and scored from 0 to 2 in the 5 areas of zygoma. A score of 2 indicated the most severely displaced fracture in one of the areas. A visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 10 was used to assess the postoperative aesthetic and functional satisfactions.
Result: The mean ages of the patients in the bioabsorbable and titanium plate groups were 33 years and 30 years, respectively. The male to female ratios were 1.2:1 (bioabsorbable plate group) and 1.1:1 (titanium plate group). The average preoperative CT scan scores of the bioabsorbable and titanium plate groups were 5.7 and 5.1, respectively. The postoperative CT scan scores of the bioabsorbable and titanium plate groups were 1.3 and 1.1, respectively. The implant cost of the bioabsorbable group was approximately 6-fold higher than that of the titanium plate group. The complication rate was similar in both groups and included complications such as palpable implant, skin irritation, and hypersensitive cheek. The patients in both groups attained similar mouth-opening function and a satisfactory score at 6 months after operation.
Conclusion: This study revealed that the bioabsorbable plate outcome was similar to the titanium plate outcome for patients with isolated unilateral zygomatic fracture. The bioabsorbable implant system provides another option for internal fixation devices in the treatment of zygomatic fractures and avoids implant removal surgery; however, the implant cost of bioabsorbable plates is higher than that of titanium plates in Taiwan.
Keywords: Bioabsorbable plate; Comparison; Titanium plate; Zygoma fracture.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.