Immunotherapy in advanced melanoma: a network meta-analysis

Immunotherapy. 2017 May;9(6):471-479. doi: 10.2217/imt-2016-0143.

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of various immunotherapeutic agents and chemotherapy for unresected or metastatic melanomas.

Methods: We performed a network meta-analysis using a Bayesian statistical model to compare objective response rate (ORR) of various immunotherapies from 12 randomized controlled studies.

Results: The estimated ORRs of immunotherapy and chemotherapy were 0.224 and 0.108, respectively. The ORRs of immunotherapy in untreated and pretreated patients were 0.279 and 0.176, respectively. In network meta-analysis, the odds ratios for ORR of nivolumab (1 mg/kg)/ipilmumab (3 mg/kg), pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg and nivolumab 3 mg/kg were 8.54, 5.39 and 4.35, respectively, compared with chemotherapy alone.

Conclusion: Our data showed that various immunotherapies had higher ORRs rather than chemotherapy alone.

Keywords: immunotherapy; malignant melanoma; network meta-analysis; objective response rate; traditional meta-analysis.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Antibodies, Monoclonal / therapeutic use*
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized / therapeutic use*
  • Antineoplastic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Humans
  • Immunotherapy / methods*
  • Ipilimumab / therapeutic use*
  • Melanoma / pathology
  • Melanoma / therapy*
  • Neoplasm Metastasis
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Network Meta-Analysis
  • Nivolumab
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Antibodies, Monoclonal
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Ipilimumab
  • Nivolumab
  • pembrolizumab