Construct Validity of an Obesity Risk Screening Tool in Two Age Groups

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Apr 14;14(4):419. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14040419.

Abstract

Home environment influences child health, but the impact varies as children move into adolescence. The Family Nutrition and Physical Activity (FNPA) screening tool has been used to evaluate home environments, but studies have not compared the utility of the tool in different age groups. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of the FNPA tool in first and tenth grade samples. Parents of first grade (n = 250) and tenth grade (n = 99) students completed the FNPA and results were linked to body mass index (BMI) data. FNPA scores were examined by gender, income, race, and school-level socioeconomic status (SES). Correlations examined associations between FNPA scores and several BMI indicators. Logistic and linear regression analyses evaluated the construct validity of the FNPA in both groups. Mean FNPA score differed by age group, by SES in both age groups, and by race in the first grade sample only. Correlations between FNPA score and BMI indicators were higher in the first grade sample, but SES was significantly associated with BMI only in tenth graders. The FNPA has stronger utility in younger children, while school SES is a stronger predictor of adolescent weight status.

Keywords: Family Nutrition and Physical Activity screening tool; obesity risk factors; socioeconomic status; youth and adolescence.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Age Factors*
  • Body Mass Index*
  • Child
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mass Screening / methods*
  • Midwestern United States
  • Obesity / diagnosis*
  • Risk Assessment / methods*
  • Social Class