[Identification of Good-Practice Projects in Promoting Physical Activity - Methods, Pitfalls and Sampled Outcomes]

Gesundheitswesen. 2017 Mar;79(S 01):S66-S72. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-123697. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
[Article in German]

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to identify and show examples of good practice of public health promotion. For this, uniform quality criteria were worked out under consideration of national and international scientific literature.For the identification of examples of good practice, a comparison of different quality criteria was carried out and combined with each other in a first step. In the following step, examples of good practice were identified after a comprehensive search. The choice of the "good-practice" projects is exemplary and lays no claim to completeness.6 main quality criteria (QC) of programs promoting physical activity could be identified in the national and international context. The analysis showed altogether 10 projects which can exemplarily be classified as examples of good practice of the target groups of children and teenagers, adults, older people and people with pre-existing illnesses. These projects, however, show major differences in their (methodological) quality.The analysis reports a lack of "Good-Practice" examples. Deficits lie mainly in documentation and sustainability. Because of incomplete documentation, an assessment as a "Good-Practice" example is only possible to a limited extent; a lot of information, particularly in the evaluation, is missing.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Exercise*
  • Germany
  • Health Promotion / organization & administration*
  • Humans
  • Models, Organizational
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care / organization & administration*
  • Physical Conditioning, Human / standards*
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care / organization & administration*
  • Quality Improvement / organization & administration*
  • Quality of Health Care / organization & administration*