The Effects of Pre-Operative Enteral Nutrition from Nasal Feeding Tubes on Gastric Outlet Obstruction

Nutrients. 2017 Apr 10;9(4):373. doi: 10.3390/nu9040373.

Abstract

We examined gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) patients who received two weeks of strengthening pre-operative enteral nutrition therapy (pre-EN) through a nasal-jejenal feeding tube placed under a gastroscope to evaluate the feasibility and potential benefit of pre-EN compared to parenteral nutrition (PN). In this study, 68 patients confirmed to have GOO with upper-gastrointestinal contrast and who accepted the operation were randomized into an EN group and a PN group. The differences in nutritional status, immune function, post-operative complications, weight of patients, first bowel sound and first flatus time, pull tube time, length of hospital stay (LOH), and cost of hospitalization between pre-operation and post-operation were all recorded. Statistical analyses were performed using the chi square test and t-test; statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. The success rate of the placement was 91.18% (three out of 31 cases). After pre-EN, the levels of weight, albumin (ALB), prealbumin (PA), and transferrin (TNF) in the EN group were significantly increased by pre-operation day compared to admission day, but were not significantly increased in the PN group; the weights in the EN group were significantly increased compared to the PN group by pre-operation day and day of discharge; total protein (TP), ALB, PA, and TNF of the EN group were significantly increased compared to the PN group on pre-operation and post-operative days one and three. The levels of CD3+, CD4+/CD8+, IgA, and IgM in the EN group were higher than those of the PN group at pre-operation and post-operation; the EN group had a significantly lower incidence of poor wound healing, peritoneal cavity infection, pneumonia, and a shorter first bowel sound time, first flatus time, and post-operation hospital stay than the PN group. Pre-EN through a nasal-jejunum feeding tube and placed under a gastroscope in GOO patients was safe, feasible, and beneficial to the nutrition status, immune function, and gastrointestinal function, and sped up recovery, while not increasing the cost of hospitalization.

Keywords: enteral nutrition; gastric outlet obstruction; gastroscope; immune function; pre-operative.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • China / epidemiology
  • Cicatrix / diagnosis
  • Cicatrix / economics
  • Cicatrix / surgery*
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Enteral Nutrition* / adverse effects
  • Enteral Nutrition* / economics
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Female
  • Gastric Outlet Obstruction / diagnosis
  • Gastric Outlet Obstruction / economics
  • Gastric Outlet Obstruction / surgery*
  • Hospital Costs
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Intubation, Gastrointestinal* / adverse effects
  • Intubation, Gastrointestinal* / economics
  • Jejunum
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nutritional Status
  • Parenteral Nutrition / adverse effects
  • Parenteral Nutrition / economics
  • Postoperative Complications / economics
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Postoperative Complications / prevention & control*
  • Postoperative Complications / therapy
  • Preoperative Care* / economics
  • Prognosis
  • Stomach Neoplasms / diagnosis
  • Stomach Neoplasms / economics
  • Stomach Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Wound Healing