Anterolateral ligament reconstruction with autologous grafting: A biomechanical study

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2017 May:44:99-103. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.03.013. Epub 2017 Mar 31.

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the reliability of the Iliotibial band compared to gracilis tendon as a graft to be used in anterolateral ligament reconstruction.

Methods: Gracilis tendon and a strip of Iliotibial band compared were harvested from 8 fresh human cadaveric knees. The gracilis tendon was prepared to obtain a graft of 10cm in length (Group 1). Iliotibial band compared was prepared to obtain a graft of 10cm in length and 0.5cm in width from the middle portion (Group 2). All the specimens were fixed on a servo hydraulic tensile machine with dedicated cryo-clamp. The loading protocol, used to compare the previously published results of ultimate failure load and Stiffness of the anterolateral ligament (Group 3), included a cyclic preconditioning between 10 and 25N at 0.1Hz for 10cycles and then a load to failure test at 20mm/min.

Findings: Gracilis tendon showed higher Ultimante Failure Load and stiffness when compared to a strip of Iliotibial band. Gracilis tendon and a strip of Iliotibial band compared showed higher Ultimante Failure Load and stiffness when compared with native anterolateral ligament as reported by Kennedy.

Interpretation: Both grafts tested in the present studies are suitable for an anatomical anterolateral ligament reconstruction.

Keywords: Anterolateral ligament; Biomechanics; Gracilis tendon; Ileotibial band.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament / surgery*
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Ligaments, Articular / surgery*
  • Male
  • Plastic Surgery Procedures
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Stress, Mechanical
  • Tendons / transplantation*
  • Transplantation, Autologous