Carrots, Not Sticks: Adverse Impact and Wellness Programs

J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Mar;59(3):250-255. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000940.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine if wellness programs are likely to produce an adverse impact in various protected groups and to determine what features of the program may contribute to adverse impact.

Methods: Using a nationally representative sample of US adults, we examined the proportions of protected groups that would be expected to encounter adverse impact using various health factors such as weight, blood pressure, and cholesterol levels.

Results: The results of this study indicate that disincentive-based programs pose a high risk of differentially selecting protected groups into program categories. This is especially true for members of multiple protected classes.

Conclusions: We suggest organizations carefully consider both the type of program and the health factors incorporated into their wellness efforts and use incentives rather than disincentives to encourage health promotion.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Blood Pressure
  • Body Mass Index
  • Career Mobility
  • Cholesterol / blood
  • Female
  • Health Promotion / statistics & numerical data*
  • Health Status*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Motivation
  • Nutrition Surveys
  • Occupational Health / statistics & numerical data*
  • Personnel Selection
  • Probability
  • Reward
  • United States
  • Work Capacity Evaluation
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Cholesterol