Pollen-mediated gene flow from transgenic perennial creeping bentgrass and hybridization at the landscape level

PLoS One. 2017 Mar 3;12(3):e0173308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173308. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

The planting of 162 ha of transgenic glyphosate-resistant creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera) near Madras, OR, USA, allowed a unique opportunity to study gene flow over time from a perennial outcrossing species at the landscape level. While conducting a four year in situ survey, we collected panicles and leaf tissue samples from creeping bentgrass and its sexually compatible species. Seeds from the panicles were planted, and seedlings were tested in the greenhouse for expression of the transgene. Gene flow via pollen was found in all four years, at frequencies of 0.004 to 2.805%. Chloroplast markers, in combination with internal transcribed spacer nuclear sequence analysis, were used to aid in identification of transgenic interspecific and intergeneric hybrid seedlings found during the testing and of established plants that could not be positively identified in the field. Interspecific transgenic hybrids produced on redtop (Agrostis gigantea) plants in situ were identified three of the four years and one intergeneric transgenic creeping bentgrass x rabbitfoot grass (Polypogon monspeliensis) hybrid was identified in 2005. In addition, we confirmed a non-transgenic creeping bentgrass x redtop hybrid in situ, demonstrating that interspecific hybrids have established in the environment outside production fields. Results of this study should be considered for deregulation of transgenic events, studies of population dynamics, and prediction of gene flow in the environment.

MeSH terms

  • Agrostis / genetics
  • Agrostis / growth & development
  • Gene Flow*
  • Hybridization, Genetic
  • India
  • Plant Leaves / genetics
  • Plant Leaves / growth & development
  • Plant Weeds / genetics*
  • Plant Weeds / growth & development
  • Plants, Genetically Modified / genetics*
  • Plants, Genetically Modified / growth & development
  • Pollen / genetics*
  • Pollen / growth & development

Grants and funding

This study was funded in part by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), Biotechnology Risk Assessment Grant number 2004-02875. Support also was received from special grants from USDA-Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) and The Scotts Company. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.