Predictive value of traction force measurement in vacuum extraction: Development of a multivariate prognostic model

PLoS One. 2017 Mar 3;12(3):e0171938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171938. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Objective: To enable early prediction of strong traction force vacuum extraction.

Design: Observational cohort.

Setting: Karolinska University Hospital delivery ward, tertiary unit.

Population and sample size: Term mid and low metal cup vacuum extraction deliveries June 2012-February 2015, n = 277.

Methods: Traction forces during vacuum extraction were collected prospectively using an intelligent handle. Levels of traction force were analysed pairwise by subjective category strong versus non-strong extraction, in order to define an objective predictive value for strong extraction.

Statistical analysis: A logistic regression model based on the shrinkage and selection method lasso was used to identify the predictive capacity of the different traction force variables.

Predictors: Total (time force integral, Newton minutes) and peak traction (Newton) force in the first to third pull; difference in traction force between the second and first pull, as well as the third and first pull respectively. Accumulated traction force at the second and third pull.

Outcome: Subjectively categorized extraction as strong versus non-strong.

Results: The prevalence of strong extraction was 26%. Prediction including the first and second pull: AUC 0,85 (CI 0,80-0,90); specificity 0,76; sensitivity 0,87; PPV 0,56; NPV 0,94. Prediction including the first to third pull: AUC 0,86 (CI 0,80-0,91); specificity 0,87; sensitivity 0,70; PPV 0,65; NPV 0,89.

Conclusion: Traction force measurement during vacuum extraction can help exclude strong category extraction from the second pull. From the third pull, two-thirds of strong extractions can be predicted.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Birth Injuries / physiopathology*
  • Equipment and Supplies / adverse effects
  • Female
  • Hemorrhage / physiopathology*
  • Humans
  • Mechanical Phenomena
  • Pregnancy
  • Prognosis*
  • Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical / adverse effects
  • Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical / methods*

Grants and funding

This study was supported by grants provided by the Swedish Patient Insurance (LÖF), VINNOVA Swedish Innovations Agency, the Karolinska Institute, Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Stockholm County Council (Agreement for Research and Education of Doctors, 551176, and KP was supported by the Stockholm County Council (Combined Clinical Residency and PhD Training Program). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.