Comparative Study of Elastic Network Model and Protein Contact Network for Protein Complexes: The Hemoglobin Case

Biomed Res Int. 2017:2017:2483264. doi: 10.1155/2017/2483264. Epub 2017 Jan 22.

Abstract

The overall topology and interfacial interactions play key roles in understanding structural and functional principles of protein complexes. Elastic Network Model (ENM) and Protein Contact Network (PCN) are two widely used methods for high throughput investigation of structures and interactions within protein complexes. In this work, the comparative analysis of ENM and PCN relative to hemoglobin (Hb) was taken as case study. We examine four types of structural and dynamical paradigms, namely, conformational change between different states of Hbs, modular analysis, allosteric mechanisms studies, and interface characterization of an Hb. The comparative study shows that ENM has an advantage in studying dynamical properties and protein-protein interfaces, while PCN is better for describing protein structures quantitatively both from local and from global levels. We suggest that the integration of ENM and PCN would give a potential but powerful tool in structural systems biology.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Allosteric Regulation
  • Computational Biology / methods*
  • Hemoglobins / metabolism*
  • Models, Biological*
  • Multiprotein Complexes / metabolism*
  • Protein Interaction Mapping*
  • Protein Multimerization
  • Signal Transduction

Substances

  • Hemoglobins
  • Multiprotein Complexes