The light-makeup advantage in facial processing: Evidence from event-related potentials

PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172489. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

The effects of makeup on attractiveness have been evaluated using mainly subjective measures. In this study, event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded from a total of 45 Japanese women (n = 23 and n = 22 for Experiment 1 and 2, respectively) to examine the neural processing of faces with no makeup, light makeup, and heavy makeup. To have the participants look at each face carefully, an identity judgement task was used: they were asked to judge whether the two faces presented in succession were of the same person or not. The ERP waveforms in response to the first faces were analyzed. In two experiments with different stimulus probabilities, the amplitudes of N170 and vertex positive potential (VPP) were smaller for faces with light makeup than for faces with heavy makeup or no makeup. The P1 amplitude did not differ between facial types. In a subsequent rating phase, faces with light makeup were rated as more attractive than faces with heavy makeup and no makeup. The results suggest that the processing fluency of faces with light makeup is one of the reasons why light makeup is preferred to heavy makeup and no makeup in daily life.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Beauty
  • Brain / physiology
  • Cosmetics*
  • Electroencephalography
  • Evoked Potentials / physiology*
  • Face / anatomy & histology*
  • Facial Expression
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Pattern Recognition, Visual / physiology*
  • Reaction Time / physiology

Substances

  • Cosmetics

Grants and funding

This study was funded by SHISEIDO CO., LTD. KT HS HI are employees of SHISEIDO CO., LTD. HN was a technical advisor of SHISEIDO CO., LTD and received remuneration therefrom for his services. The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors (KT, HS, HI) as well as research funds, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.