Comparing the interface pressure redistribution after applying three different types of cushions: differences according to cushion type

J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Jan;29(1):128-132. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.128. Epub 2017 Jan 30.

Abstract

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to compare the interface pressure redistribution when sitting after applying three different types of cushions and on a firm surface in individuals in their 20s and those older than 60 years old. [Subjects and Methods] Healthy 100 elderly (60 years and older) subjects and 111 college students participated in this study. Interface pressure redistribution while sitting on a firm surface or honeycomb, air, and memory foam cushions, examined in that order. [Results] For all groups, significant differences were found in the total pressure mean among sitting states. When the hip and thigh interface pressure among sitting states were compared within each group, significant differences were found in the mean right hip pressure, mean left hip pressure, peak right hip pressure, peak left hip pressure, right hip pressure ratio, and left hip pressure ratio. [Conclusion] Our data indicated that the type of cushion should be considered and fit for individuals when recommending appropriate interface pressure redistribution cushions.

Keywords: Interface pressure; Pressure mapping; Pressure relief cushion.