Conservative versus Surgical Management of Iatrogenic Tracheal Rupture

Med Princ Pract. 2017;26(3):218-220. doi: 10.1159/000455859. Epub 2017 Jan 9.

Abstract

Iatrogenic tracheal rupture (ITR) represents a life-threatening condition requiring prompt diagnosis, management, and treatment. The management of ITR is challenging, and treatment options depend on tear location, size, injury extent, and the patient's respiratory status. Although this complication has been extensively reported in published literature, the best evidence practice, for the management, requires clarification. In this review, the authors focused on the establishment of a differential diagnosis and the potential mechanism of the injury, the decision-making process, and the therapeutic approaches. It is suggested that for small lacerations or stable patients, conservative management could be considered sufficient, whereas invasive surgical therapy would be more appropriate in cases of large defects with significant air leak and patient instability.

Keywords: Iatrogenic surgical emphysema; Intubation; Pneumomediastinum; Tracheal rupture.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Clinical Protocols
  • Humans
  • Intubation, Intratracheal / adverse effects
  • Respiration, Artificial / methods
  • Rupture / diagnosis*
  • Rupture / diagnostic imaging
  • Rupture / surgery
  • Rupture / therapy*
  • Trachea / injuries*
  • Tracheotomy / adverse effects