Understanding the low uptake of bone-anchored hearing aids: a review

J Laryngol Otol. 2017 Mar;131(3):190-201. doi: 10.1017/S0022215116009981. Epub 2017 Jan 26.

Abstract

Background: Bone-anchored hearing aids improve hearing for patients for whom conventional behind-the-ear aids are problematic. However, uptake of bone-anchored hearing aids is low and it is important to understand why this is the case.

Method: A narrative review was conducted. Studies examining why people accept or decline bone-anchored hearing aids and satisfaction levels of people with bone-anchored hearing aids were reviewed.

Results: Reasons for declining bone-anchored hearing aids included limited perceived benefits, concerns about surgery, aesthetic concerns and treatment cost. No studies providing in-depth analysis of the reasons for declining or accepting bone-anchored hearing aids were identified. Studies of patient satisfaction showed that most participants reported benefits with bone-anchored hearing aids. However, most studies used cross-sectional and/or retrospective designs and only included people with bone-anchored hearing aids.

Conclusion: Important avenues for further research are in-depth qualitative research designed to fully understand the decision-making process for bone-anchored hearing aids and rigorous quantitative research comparing satisfaction of people who receive bone-anchored hearing aids with those who receive alternative (or no) treatments.

Keywords: Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids; Correction of Hearing Impairment; Decision Making; Hearing Aids; Hearing Loss; Patient Satisfaction.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Bone Conduction
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Decision Making
  • Hearing Aids / psychology*
  • Hearing Loss, Conductive / psychology*
  • Humans
  • Patient Satisfaction*
  • Prostheses and Implants / psychology*
  • Retrospective Studies