Whaddaya Know: A Guide to Uncertainty and Subjectivity in Structural Biology

Trends Biochem Sci. 2017 Feb;42(2):155-167. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.11.002. Epub 2017 Jan 12.

Abstract

The methods of structural biology, while powerful, are technically complex. Although the Protein Data Bank (PDB) provides a repository that allows anyone to download any structure, many users would not appreciate the caveats that should be considered when examining a structure. Here, we describe several key uncertainties associated with the application of X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, single-particle electron microscopy (SPEM), and small-angle scattering (SAS) to biological macromolecules. The take-home message is that structures are not absolute truths - they are models that fit the experimental data and therefore have uncertainty and subjectivity associated with them. These uncertainties must be appreciated - careful reading of the associated paper, and any validation report provided by the structure database, is highly recommended.

Keywords: NMR spectroscopy; X-ray crystallography; single-particle cryo-electron microscopy; small-angle scattering; structural biology; uncertainty.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Crystallography, X-Ray
  • Macromolecular Substances / chemistry*
  • Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
  • Microscopy, Electron
  • Models, Molecular
  • Molecular Biology*
  • Scattering, Small Angle
  • Uncertainty*

Substances

  • Macromolecular Substances