Protocol for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is it rocket science?

World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Dec 21;22(47):10287-10303. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i47.10287.

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) does not require advanced techniques, and its performance has therefore rapidly spread worldwide. However, the rate of biliary injuries has not decreased. The concept of the critical view of safety (CVS) was first documented two decades ago. Unexpected injuries are principally due to misidentification of human factors. The surgeon's assumption is a major cause of misidentification, and a high level of experience alone is not sufficient for successful LC. We herein describe tips and pitfalls of LC in detail and discuss various technical considerations. Finally, based on a review of important papers and our own experience, we summarize the following mandatory protocol for safe LC: (1) consideration that a high level of experience alone is not enough; (2) recognition of the plateau involving the common hepatic duct and hepatic hilum; (3) blunt dissection until CVS exposure; (4) Calot's triangle clearance in the overhead view; (5) Calot's triangle clearance in the view from underneath; (6) dissection of the posterior right side of Calot's triangle; (7) removal of the gallbladder body; and (8) positive CVS exposure. We believe that adherence to this protocol will ensure successful and beneficial LC worldwide, even in patients with inflammatory changes and rare anatomies.

Keywords: Biliary injury; Critical view of safety; Gallbladder; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Protocol.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Biliary Tract Diseases / etiology
  • Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic / adverse effects
  • Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic / methods*
  • Clinical Competence
  • Clinical Protocols*
  • Elective Surgical Procedures
  • Humans
  • Learning Curve
  • Patient Safety
  • Risk Factors
  • Treatment Outcome