Impact of Bridging Income Generation with Group Integrated Care (BIGPIC) on Hypertension and Diabetes in Rural Western Kenya

J Gen Intern Med. 2017 May;32(5):540-548. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3918-5. Epub 2016 Dec 5.

Abstract

Background: Rural settings in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) consistently report low participation in non-communicable disease (NCD) treatment programs and poor outcomes.

Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the impact of the implementation of a patient-centered rural NCD care delivery model called Bridging Income Generation through grouP Integrated Care (BIGPIC).

Design: The study prospectively tracked participation and health outcomes for participants in a screening event and compared linkage frequencies to a historical comparison group.

Participants: Rural Kenyan participants attending a voluntary NCD screening event were included within the BIGPIC model of care.

Interventions: The BIGPIC model utilizes a contextualized care delivery model designed to address the unique barriers faced in rural settings. This model emphasizes the following steps: (1) find patients in the community, (2) link to peer/microfinance groups, (3) integrate education, (4) treat in the community, (5) enhance economic sustainability and (6) generate demand for care through incentives.

Main measures: The primary outcome is the linkage frequency, which measures the percentage of patients who return for care after screening positive for either hypertension and/or diabetes. Secondary measures include retention frequencies defined as the percentage of patients remaining engaged in care throughout the 9-month follow-up period and changes in systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and blood sugar over 12 months.

Key results: Of the 879 individuals who were screened, 14.2 % were confirmed to have hypertension, while only 1.4 % were confirmed to have diabetes. The implementation of a comprehensive microfinance-linked, community-based, group care model resulted in 72.4 % of screen-positive participants returning for subsequent care, of which 70.3 % remained in care through the 12 months of the evaluation period. Patients remaining in care demonstrated a statistically significant mean decline of 21 mmHg in SBP [95 % CI (13.9 to 28.4), P < 0.01] and 5 mmHg drop in DBP [95 % CI (1.4 to 7.6), P < 0.01].

Conclusions: The implementation of a contextualized care delivery model built around the unique needs of rural SSA participants led to statistically significant improvements in linkage to care and blood pressure reduction.

Keywords: agriculture; diabetes; hypertension; incentives; microfinance; portable care; rural; sub-Saharan Africa.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Blood Pressure / physiology
  • Diabetes Mellitus / economics*
  • Diabetes Mellitus / epidemiology
  • Diabetes Mellitus / therapy*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Hypertension / economics*
  • Hypertension / epidemiology
  • Hypertension / therapy*
  • Income / trends*
  • Kenya
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pilot Projects
  • Prospective Studies
  • Rural Population / trends*