Confocal microscopy and imaging profilometry: A new tool aimed to evaluate aesthetic procedures

J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2017 Feb;19(1):59-63. doi: 10.1080/14764172.2016.1247962. Epub 2016 Dec 2.

Abstract

According to the American Academy of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, more than 11 million cosmetic surgical and nonsurgical procedures were performed by board-certified plastic surgeons, dermatologists and otolaryngologists in the United States, totaling more than 12 billion dollars. We performed a retrospective observational multi-centric study on patients treated with a non-animal origin cross-linked hyaluronic acid with different molecular weights for nasolabial folds, evaluating through a new imaging system, profilometric techniques with the confocal microscopy, the durability, the efficacy and the safety of this product. From 25 patients, 150 silicone casts were obtained: 75 casts of the right nasolabial fold and 75 casts of the left nasolabial fold. Roughness arithmetical average of the right fold at T2 decreased by 50% versus T0 and by 40% compared to T1; at T2, it decreased by the 45% versus T0 and by 35% compared to T1. No side effects were reported. Results proved that the analysis of the skin microreliefs through confocal microscopy is a new imaging system that allows to evaluate with precision and safety the results of aesthetic treatments such as fillers objectively.

Keywords: Confocal microscopy; hyaluronic acid fillers; profilometry.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cosmetic Techniques
  • Dermal Fillers / chemistry
  • Dermal Fillers / therapeutic use*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hyaluronic Acid / chemistry
  • Hyaluronic Acid / therapeutic use*
  • Microscopy, Confocal
  • Middle Aged
  • Molecular Weight
  • Nasolabial Fold*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Dermal Fillers
  • Hyaluronic Acid