Melanomas vs. nevi in high-risk patients under long-term monitoring with digital dermatoscopy: do melanomas and nevi already differ at baseline?

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017 Jun;31(6):972-977. doi: 10.1111/jdv.14065. Epub 2017 Jan 10.

Abstract

Background: What lesions to select for a most efficient dermatoscopic monitoring of patients with multiple nevi remains an unresolved issue.

Objective: To compare the grade of atypia of melanomas and nevi of the same patient at baseline.

Methods: Prospective observational study using 236 dermatoscopic baseline images (59 quartets from 59 patients, each including one melanoma detected during follow-up and three nevi). Dermatologists (n = 26) were asked to assess the 'grade of dermatoscopic atypia' on a numerical scale and to identify the melanomas.

Results: On average, each dermatologist identified 24 of 59 melanomas (40%, range: 11-37). The number of correct picks was greater for dermatologists with moderate (mean: 28) or high (mean: 28) experience compared to beginners (mean 17; P < 0.001). In three of the 59 sets, none of the 26 dermatologists identified the melanoma. The mean grade of dermatoscopic atypia was 2.5 for nevi (95% CI: 2.4-2.6) and 3.0 for melanomas (95% CI: 2.9-3.1, P < 0.001).

Limitations: Rating dermatologists were informed that each quartet of images included one melanoma creating substantial deviation from a real-life situation.

Conclusion: A significant proportion of melanomas detected during follow-up cannot be differentiated from nevi at baseline. This necessitates the additional inclusion of less atypical lesions for monitoring.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Dermoscopy / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Melanoma / pathology*
  • Middle Aged
  • Monitoring, Physiologic / methods*
  • Nevus / pathology*