A Novel Large-Scale Temperature Dominated Model for Predicting the End of the Growing Season

PLoS One. 2016 Nov 28;11(11):e0167302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167302. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Vegetation phenology regulates many ecosystem processes and is an indicator of the biological responses to climate change. It is important to model the timing of leaf senescence accurately, since the canopy duration and carbon assimilation are strongly determined by the timings of leaf senescence. However, the existing phenology models are unlikely to accurately predict the end of the growing season (EGS) on large scales, resulting in the misrepresentation of the seasonality and interannual variability of biosphere-atmosphere feedbacks and interactions in coupled global climate models. In this paper, we presented a novel large-scale temperature dominated model integrated with the physiological adaptation of plants to the local temperature to assess the spatial pattern and interannual variability of the EGS. Our model was validated in all temperate vegetation types over the Northern Hemisphere. The results indicated that our model showed better performance in representing the spatial and interannual variability of leaf senescence, compared with the original phenology model in the Integrated Biosphere Simulator (IBIS). Our model explained approximately 63% of the EGS variations, whereas the original model explained much lower variations (coefficient of determination R2 = 0.01-0.18). In addition, the differences between the EGS reproduced by our model and the MODIS EGS at 71.3% of the pixels were within 10 days. For the original model, it is only 26.1%. We also found that the temperature threshold (TcritTm) of grassland was lower than that of woody species in the same latitudinal zone.

MeSH terms

  • Adaptation, Physiological*
  • Climate Change
  • Ecosystem
  • Models, Theoretical*
  • Plant Development / physiology*
  • Plant Physiological Phenomena*
  • Seasons*
  • Temperature*

Grants and funding

This study was supported by the Program for One-hundred Talent Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Y5AA100A01). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.